ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Bacterial ghosts (BGs): A promising approach as candidate vaccine.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial ghosts (BGs) are an emerging vaccine platform produced by completely removing the cytoplasmic contents of bacterial cells while preserving their native surface architecture. This unique structural integrity enables BGs to function simultaneously as safe, non-living vaccines and efficient delivery vehicles. Recent advances in both genetic (phage lysis gene E) and chemical "sponge-like" protocols have expanded the range of microorganisms from which BGs can be produced, improving safety, scalability, and antigenic stability. This review summarizes current progress in BG technology with a focus on their innovative applications as antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer vaccines; adjuvants; and carriers for DNA, proteins, and bioactive molecules. Particular emphasis is placed on emerging directions such as yeast and fungal ghosts, novel characterization methods, and the development of BG-based nano-vaccines. Future prospects highlight the need for standardized production, improved clinical translation, and comparative evaluation with related platforms such as membrane vesicles. Together, these advancements position BGs as a promising next-generation vaccine and drug-delivery strategy with significant potential for translational impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41618007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.