Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618007›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026

Bacterial ghosts (BGs): A promising approach as candidate vaccine.

Helal F Hetta, Ibraheem M Mwafey, Noura H Abd Ellah, Fawaz E Alanazi, Yasmin N Ramadan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helal F HettaDivision of Microbiology, Immunology and Biotechnology, Department of Natural Products and Alternative Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-7304
Ibraheem M MwafeyDepartment of Oral Medicine and Periodontology Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, Assiut Branch, Al- Azhar University, Assiut, 71524, Egypt.
Noura H Abd EllahDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, 71515, Assiut, Egypt.
Fawaz E AlanaziDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia.
Yasmin N RamadanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt. Yasmine_Mohamed@pharm.aun.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial ghosts (BGs) are an emerging vaccine platform produced by completely removing the cytoplasmic contents of bacterial cells while preserving their native surface architecture. This unique structural integrity enables BGs to function simultaneously as safe, non-living vaccines and efficient delivery vehicles. Recent advances in both genetic (phage lysis gene E) and chemical "sponge-like" protocols have expanded the range of microorganisms from which BGs can be produced, improving safety, scalability, and antigenic stability. This review summarizes current progress in BG technology with a focus on their innovative applications as antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer vaccines; adjuvants; and carriers for DNA, proteins, and bioactive molecules. Particular emphasis is placed on emerging directions such as yeast and fungal ghosts, novel characterization methods, and the development of BG-based nano-vaccines. Future prospects highlight the need for standardized production, improved clinical translation, and comparative evaluation with related platforms such as membrane vesicles. Together, these advancements position BGs as a promising next-generation vaccine and drug-delivery strategy with significant potential for translational impact.

Indexed as

BacteriaVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccinesBacterial ghosts (BGs)Gene E-mediated lysisImmunotherapyVaccine platformVaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.