Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617968›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning models for predicting treatment outcomes in chronic non-specific back pain patients undergoing lumbar extension traction.

Ibrahim M Moustafa, Dilber Uzun Ozsahin, Mubarak Taiwo Mustapha, Shima Zadeh, Iman Khowailed, Paul A Oakley, Deed E Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pelvic morphology decoupling from lumbar lordosis in chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ibrahim M MoustafaDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, 27272, United Arab Emirates.
Dilber Uzun OzsahinDepartment of Medical Diagnostic Imaging, College of Health Science, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Mubarak Taiwo MustaphaOperational Research Centre in Healthcare, Near East University, TRNC Mersin 10, Nicosia, 99138, Turkey.
Shima ZadehDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, 27272, United Arab Emirates.
Iman KhowailedDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, 27272, United Arab Emirates.
Paul A OakleyCBP Nonprofit (a Spine Research Foundation), Eagle, ID, 83616, USA.
Deed E HarrisonCBP Nonprofit (a Spine Research Foundation), Eagle, ID, 83616, USA. drdeedharrison@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservative treatment for chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) includes lumbar extension traction (LET) to re-align lumbar lordosis (LL). This study explores the use of machine learning (ML) models to predict post-treatment outcomes in patients with CLBP undergoing LET and how these predictions can support clinical decision-making. We utilized a retrospective database of 431 consecutive patients with uncomplicated CLBP. Post-treatment variables predicted included LL, NRS pain score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Input model variables included pre-treatment LL, sacral base angle (SBA), ratio of LL/SBA fit type, NRS, ODI, frequency, duration, LET compliance, and demographic variables of age and BMI. Initial variables were analyzed to predict post-treatment outcomes. Three ML models—Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)—were employed to handle both continuous and categorical variables, and performance was evaluated for predictive accuracy. Factors affecting outcomes were identified using Shapley Additive Explanations. Treatment was a multimodal spine rehabilitation program featuring LET applied 3–6 times per week, varied between 4 and 10 weeks, and follow-up was performed at the end of care. Improvements in LL, NRS, and ODI were − 11.5° to − 23.6°, 7.3/10 to 3.3/10, and 33.2% to 10.4%, respectively. Among the ML models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for lumbar lordotic angle (R2 = 0.728) and pain score (R2 = 0.648), while Random Forest slightly outperformed XGBoost for ODI (0.631 vs. 0.616). MLP performed poorly for ODI predictions (R2 = 0.201), indicating difficulty in capturing functional disability patterns. SHAP analysis identified fit type, compliance, traction frequency, pre-treatment lumbar curve, and BMI as the most influential predictors. These predictors offer actionable insight for clinical decision-making by allowing clinicians to stratify patients based on predicted responsiveness, tailor LET frequency and duration, and educate patients on the importance of compliance. This study demonstrates that ML models, particularly XGBoost and Random Forest, can effectively predict LET outcomes, supporting personalized treatment strategies for CLBP patients.

Indexed as

Low Back PainMachine LearningTractionAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDisabilityExtension tractionLordosisLow back painMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID41617968
PMCPMC12913676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.