Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617948›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Modeling of conductivity for carbon black nanocomposites incorporating network concentration, interphase conductivity and tunneling dimensions.

Yasser Zare, Nima Gharib, Jin-Hwan Choi, Kyong Yop Rhee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yasser ZareBiomaterials and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Interdisciplinary Technologies, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. y.zare@aut.ac.ir.
Nima GharibCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, 54200, Egaila, Kuwait.
Jin-Hwan ChoiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering College of Engineering , Kyung Hee University , Yongin, Republic of Korea. jhchoi@khu.ac.kr.
Kyong Yop RheeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering College of Engineering , Kyung Hee University , Yongin, Republic of Korea. rheeky@khu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the numerous experimented works on the conductivity of carbon black (CB) polymer nanocomposites (PCBs), the modeling methods remain imperfect and require further investigation. Herein, a simple and applicable model for estimating the PCB electrical conductivity is proposed by measurable and meaningful features of CB nanoparticles, interphase, network and tunnelling zone among nearby CBs. Our model also incorporates the significant terms such as the percolation onset, polymer – CB interfacial tension, the percentage of CB and interphase contributing to the network and interphase conductivity (σi). Many experimented conductivities of real PCBs and parametric checkups are used to verify the suggested model. The thickest interphase (t = 20 nm) with the highest conductivity (σi = 400 S/m) yields the conductivity of 7 S/m, while the composite is insulated by the thinnest interphase with the poorest conductivity (t = 3 nm and σi < 250 S/m). Also, the slimmest tunnels (λ = 1 nm) and their poorest polymer resistivity (p = 30 Ω.m) raise the conductivity to 2.2 S/m. However, bigger tunnels (λ > 5.5 nm) highly weaken the conductivity to 0.1 S/m. Accordingly, the characteristics of interphase and tunnels largely handle the conductivity of PCBs.

Indexed as

Carbon blackConductivityElectron tunnelingInterphase zonePolymer nanocomposite

Identifiers

PMID41617948
PMCPMC12913974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.