Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617920›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2026

Northern Peatlands in Transition in the 21st Century - Land Use, Status, Policies and Future Trajectories: Comparisons Between Finland, Ireland and Scotland.

Maija Lampela, Florence Renou-Wilson, Roxane Andersen, David Wilson, Rebekka R E Artz, Hannah Clilverd, Jukka Turunen, Anne Tolvanen, Liisa Maanavilja, Anna M Laine

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maija LampelaEnvironmental Solutions, Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, Finland. maija.lampela@gtk.fi.
Florence Renou-WilsonSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Roxane AndersenEnvironmental Research Institute, University of the Highlands and Islands, Thurso, UK.
David WilsonEarthy Matters Environmental Consultants Co., Donegal, Ireland.
Rebekka R E ArtzEcological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, UK.
Hannah ClilverdUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Penicuik, UK.
Jukka TurunenEnvironmental Solutions, Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Anne TolvanenNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Oulu, Finland.
Liisa MaanaviljaEnvironmental Solutions, Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Anna M LaineEnvironmental Solutions, Geological Survey of Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland Flagship funding for ACCC 337550Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Catch the Carbon ProgrammeMinistry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland Catch the Carbon ProgrammeNERC MOTHERSHIP project NE/V01854X/1Scottish Government RESAS Strategic Research Programme 2022-2027 KJHI-D3-2The Leverhulme Trust RL-2019-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and biodiversity losses have necessitated innovative approaches to peatland management. This study examines pivotal historical landmarks and the recent forces of change that have affected peatlands in Finland, Ireland and Scotland, highlighting how national contexts, such as land ownership, forestry, agriculture and the need for domestic energy sources, have shaped the peatland use in those countries. We further introduce national and EU policies, which include, for example, national peatland strategies, and identify barriers to sustainable management of these important ecosystems. We propose six key solutions that could improve peatland persistence more broadly in northern Europe: (1) adoption of an integrated, landscape-scale strategy for rewetting and restoration with multi-stakeholder collaboration, (2) enhancement of monitoring to improve outcomes and refine best practices, (3) alignment of both national and EU policies across relevant sectors (energy, climate change, biodiversity, land use) to promote sustainable peatland management, (4) minimisation of trade-offs between green energy transition and sustainable peatland management, (5) engagement with local communities in restoration efforts for better acceptability and outcomes, and (6) wider leverage of market-based mechanisms, such as carbon, biodiversity and water credits, to finance peatland restoration. Together, these measures provide a pathway for the sustainable management of northern peatlands by balancing environmental integrity with socio-economic needs.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental PolicyWetlandsAgricultureBiodiversityClimate ChangeEcosystemFinlandForestryIrelandScotlandSoilSoilMiresNational Peatland StrategiesPeatPeatlandsRestorationRewetting

Identifiers

PMID41617920
PMCPMC12858519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.