SynthesisScientific reports2026
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the mechanism of action of Tai Chi on cardiovascular disease: evidence map of aerobic and mind-body exercise pathways.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Tai Chi is a mind-body exercise with reported cardiovascular benefits, but its mechanistic pathways and comparative effects versus aerobic exercise are not well defined. To synthesize evidence on the effects and proposed mechanisms of Tai Chi on CVD risk factors and related biomarkers, compared with aerobic exercise or standard care. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA. We searched Google Scholar, PubMed, EBSCOhost MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science from inception to October 2025. We included studies comparing Tai Chi with aerobic exercise and/or standard care and reporting outcomes related to CVD risk factors, functional capacity, mental health, or mechanistic biomarkers. Random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed where appropriate. Sixty studies were included (39 randomized controlled trials and 21 reviews). Tai Chi significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (MD -6.14 mmHg, 95% CI -8.44 to -3.84) and diastolic blood pressure (MD -3.45 mmHg, 95% CI -4.50 to -2.40). Improvements were also observed in HDL-C (SMD 0.43, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.69) and functional capacity (6-minute walk test, SMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.05). Reported psychosocial outcomes included reductions in fatigue and depression. Evidence mapping suggests Tai Chi may influence autonomic regulation and inflammatory/stress-related pathways (e.g., heart rate variability, IL-6, CRP), alongside improvements in lipid profile and functional performance. Tai Chi may offer clinically meaningful improvements in blood pressure, lipid-related outcomes, functional capacity, and psychosocial health. Mechanistic findings suggest potential effects on autonomic and inflammatory pathways, but comparative advantages over aerobic exercise and biomarker outcomes are supported largely by low- to moderate-certainty evidence and should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.