ArticleScientific reports2026
Attention driven deep convolutional network with optimized learning for accurate landslide detection and monitoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective landslide monitoring is essential for mitigating risks to infrastructure and communities, particularly in geologically unstable regions. Traditional monitoring methods, such as ground surveys and visual inspections, are time-intensive and lack early detection capabilities. To address these limitations, this study employs feature fusion and enhanced Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) for landslide detection. The model is built upon a fine-tuned, pre-trained VGG16 architecture, adapted to a new landslide dataset. Key modifications include the integration of a spatial attention mechanism, optimized learning rate schedules, attention-based Global Average Pooling (GAP), and the Lookahead Adam optimizer, all aimed at improving feature extraction, model convergence, and generalization. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves high accuracy, with performance ranging from 90% to 96% across different datasets and training iterations. Using the Kaggle Landslide Dataset, the model attained a training accuracy of 93%, with validation and testing accuracies of 95.2% and 95.8%, respectively. Comparable results were observed with the NASA Landslide Inventory, confirming the robustness of the method. The findings highlight the potential of DCNN-based models, augmented with attention mechanisms, as a reliable and efficient tool for landslide monitoring, significantly outperforming conventional assessment methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.