Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617901›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

¹H-NMR serum metabolomic profiling from clinical routine identifies signatures of progressive melanoma metastasis.

Frank Friedrich Gellrich, Cosima Hufnagel, Alexander M Funk, Sophie Jonas, Heidi Altmann, Sarah Hobelsberger, Julian Steininger, Ricarda Rauschenberg, Marlene Garzarolli, Sophia Lehr and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Frank Friedrich GellrichDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. frankfriedrich.gellrich@ukdd.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2164-4644
Cosima HufnagelDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0859-2915
Alexander M FunkInstitute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-4599
Sophie JonasInstitute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Heidi AltmannBioBank Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-0330
Sarah HobelsbergerDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5703-324X
Julian SteiningerDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9094-4512
Ricarda RauschenbergDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4054-4024
Marlene GarzarolliDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sophia LehrDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2639-6010
Lea PöschmanDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4126-8248
Paula BiedermannDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-0565
Julia Sophie SchatzDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christina FeigeDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Alpaslan TasdoganDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2543-852X
Triantafyllos ChavakisInstitute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-5141
Stefan BeissertDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8475
Friedegund MeierDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-9706
Peter Mirtschink *Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5832-1673
Gerald Steiner *Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7625-343X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of active melanoma metastasis is crucial. Serum metabolomics may offer non-invasive biomarkers, but real-world applicability needs validation. This study aimed to identify ¹H-NMR-based serum metabolic signatures for active metastasis in a large clinical cohort. Serum from 963 melanoma patients (1698 samples) underwent ¹H-NMR spectroscopy. Patients were classified by active metastasis status. OPLS-DA and RFE followed by logistic regression models were developed on a patient-level training/test split. Subgroup analyses assessed signatures related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) therapy, brain metastases, and BRAF status. Models for active metastasis showed moderate test set discrimination (Area Under the Curve [AUCs]: OPLS-DA 0.609, RFE 0.630). The RFE-model highlighted seven significant metabolites: increased pyruvate, phenylalanine, acetoacetate, glutamate, glucose, and decreased histidine and citrate were associated with active metastasis. OPLS-DA yielded concordant metabolites. Subgroup analyses revealed distinct metabolic associations, e.g., for ICI therapy (citrate, RFE AUC 0.721) and BRAF status (acetate, RFE AUC 0.655), but limited performance for brain metastases (RFE AUC 0.553). ¹H-NMR serum metabolomics detects systemic metabolic alterations of active melanoma metastasis with moderate accuracy in a real-world setting. Identified disruptions in energy and amino acid metabolism offer pathobiological insights and warrant investigation for multimodal biomarker panels.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMelanomaMetabolomeMetabolomicsAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersMelanomaMetabolic profilingPredictive modelTumor metabolism

Identifiers

PMID41617901
PMCPMC12881348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.