Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617861›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Assessing personality using zero-shot generative AI scoring of brief open-ended text.

Aidan G C Wright, Whitney R Ringwald, Colin E Vize, Johannes C Eichstaedt, Mike Angstadt, Aman Taxali, Chandra Sripada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aidan G C WrightDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. aidangcw@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2369-0601
Whitney R RingwaldDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Colin E VizeDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3005-0688
Johannes C EichstaedtDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mike AngstadtDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-7649
Aman TaxaliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Chandra SripadaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9025-6453

Funding

Developing Personalized Predictive Models of AggressionK01MH130746 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Colin Vize · 2023 to 2026
$716k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH130746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary personality assessment relies heavily on psychometric scales, which offer efficiency but risk oversimplifying the rich and contextual nature of personality. Recognizing these limitations, this study explores the use of commercially available generative large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, Claude and so on, to assess personality traits from open-ended qualitative narratives. Across two distinct samples and methodologies (spontaneous streams of thought and daily video diaries), we used seven commercial, generative LLMs to score Big-Five personality traits, achieving convergence with self-report measures comparable to or exceeding established benchmarks (for example, self-other agreement, ecological momentary assessment, and bespoke machine learning models). Although results differed across different LLMs, we found that using the average LLM score across models provided the strongest agreement with self-report. Further, LLM-generated trait scores also demonstrated predictive validity regarding daily behaviours and mental health outcomes. This LLM-based approach achieved quantitative rigour based on qualitative data and is easily accessible without specialized training. Importantly, our findings also reaffirm that personality is expressed ubiquitously, in that it is carried in the stream of our thoughts and is woven into the fabric of our daily lives. These results encourage broader adoption of generative LLMs for psychological assessment and-given the new generation of tools-stress the value of idiographic narratives as reliable sources of psychological insight.

Indexed as

PersonalityPersonality AssessmentGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language ModelsMachine LearningPsychometricsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID41617861
PMCPMC12974486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.