ArticleNature human behaviour2026
Assessing personality using zero-shot generative AI scoring of brief open-ended text.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personality Inference From Semistructured Interviews Using Large Language Models: Comparative Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Derived Outputs as Psychological Measures: A Five-Domain Psychometric Framework With Application to Daily Stress.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Scalable, context-sensitive psychiatric assessment with large language models and brief diaries.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- An fMRI dataset of verbalized spontaneous thought with annotated transcripts and self-report trait measures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Language-based personality assessment from life narratives: a focus on model interpretability and efficiency.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
- From free association to free parameters: machine-learning empowers artificial intelligence models to rate the affective-relational aspects of narratives like an expert psychologist.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- From direct scoring to cue integration: big five prediction from spoken responses to a picture-based self-projection task.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contemporary personality assessment relies heavily on psychometric scales, which offer efficiency but risk oversimplifying the rich and contextual nature of personality. Recognizing these limitations, this study explores the use of commercially available generative large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, Claude and so on, to assess personality traits from open-ended qualitative narratives. Across two distinct samples and methodologies (spontaneous streams of thought and daily video diaries), we used seven commercial, generative LLMs to score Big-Five personality traits, achieving convergence with self-report measures comparable to or exceeding established benchmarks (for example, self-other agreement, ecological momentary assessment, and bespoke machine learning models). Although results differed across different LLMs, we found that using the average LLM score across models provided the strongest agreement with self-report. Further, LLM-generated trait scores also demonstrated predictive validity regarding daily behaviours and mental health outcomes. This LLM-based approach achieved quantitative rigour based on qualitative data and is easily accessible without specialized training. Importantly, our findings also reaffirm that personality is expressed ubiquitously, in that it is carried in the stream of our thoughts and is woven into the fabric of our daily lives. These results encourage broader adoption of generative LLMs for psychological assessment and-given the new generation of tools-stress the value of idiographic narratives as reliable sources of psychological insight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.