ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative analysis of copper and graphite electrodes in EDM of Al-SiC metal matrix composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive investigation of electrical discharge machining (EDM) applied to Al-SiC metal matrix composites (MMCs), focusing on the comparative performance of copper and graphite tool electrodes. Material removal rate (MRR) and tool wear rate (TWR) were considered as the primary response variables, while current, pulse-on time (TON), and pulse-off time (TOFF) served as the controlling parameters. A Box–Behnken experimental design was employed to construct the design matrix, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the process variables. Results indicate that both current and TON exert a strong influence on MRR and TWR, whereas increasing TOFF consistently reduces TWR for both electrodes. Overall, copper electrodes demonstrated superior machinability, offering up to 18% higher MRR and 25% lower TWR compared to graphite. These findings establish copper as a more efficient tool material for EDM of Al–SiC MMCs and provide practical guidelines for optimizing EDM parameters to enhance productivity and reduce tool wear in composite machining applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.