ArticleScientific reports2026
Predictors of reverse cardiac remodeling after sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reverse Remodeling Following Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation in CRT-Treated HFrEF Patients: Insights from a Real-World Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is associated with reverse cardiac remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the predictors of reverse cardiac remodeling after Sac/Val have not yet been fully established. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of reverse cardiac remodeling in patients with HFrEF, with a focus on HF duration and the dose of Sac/Val. In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, 600 patients with HFrEF who received a Sac/Val prescription were enrolled at six tertiary hospitals in Korea between February 2017 and April 2019. After excluding patients without baseline or 12-month follow-up echocardiographic data, 294 patients were enrolled. Reverse cardiac remodeling was defined by comparing the baseline and follow-up echocardiographic data: an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 10% and a relative decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index ≥ 10%. The average daily Sac/Val dose was calculated during the first 6 and 12 months after initiation. Among the 294 patients, 107 presented with reverse cardiac remodeling at 12 months. Patients with HF duration < 12 months at the time of Sac/Val initiation showed a higher proportion of reverse cardiac remodeling than patients with HF duration ≥ 12 months (46.1% vs. 25.7%; P < 0.001). Patients with an average daily Sac/Val dose ≥ 200 mg/day over 6 months also had a higher proportion of reverse cardiac remodeling than patients with Sac/Val < 200 mg/day (44.0% vs. 31.9%; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed low baseline LVEF, HF duration < 12 months, and higher Sac/Val dose as independent predictors of reverse cardiac remodeling. In conclusion, early initiation of Sac/Val following HF diagnosis and higher Sac/Val doses were associated with a higher likelihood of reverse cardiac remodeling in HFrEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.