Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617849›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Auditory cortex modulates call duration in rats.

Wei Tang, Miguel Concha-Miranda, Michael Brecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei Tang *Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Miguel Concha-Miranda *Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael BrechtBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. michael.brecht@bccn-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-0953

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) EXC-2049 - 390688087 (NeuroCure)Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) project number 327654276 SFB 1315Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) Project number 532521431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The flexibility of human vocal production is well studied, but the direct role of the auditory system in regulating vocalizations in rodents remains largely unexplored. We show that during vocalizations, a fraction of rat auditory cortex neurons shows pre-call activity and different patterns of responses during calls and playback of calls. Additionally, we classified five auditory cortical vocalization responses: pre-call activated, onset activated, onset suppressed, ramping activated and ramping suppressed neurons. Intriguingly, onset suppressed cells can predict vocalization duration and occurrence. Injecting the auditory cortex with muscimol (GABA_A receptor agonist) prolonged vocalizations, while injecting the auditory cortex with gabazine (GABA_A receptor antagonist) shortened them. Similar reductions in call duration were observed during external white-noise stimulation of the auditory cortex and/or other auditory brain structures, resembling the effects of gabazine. Together, neuronal recordings, pharmacological interference and noise induced vocal modifications indicate direct modulation of vocal productions by the rat auditory cortex.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA-A Receptor AntagonistsMaleMuscimolNeuronsPyridazinesRatsGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA-A Receptor AntagonistsgabazineMuscimolPyridazines

Identifiers

PMID41617849
PMCPMC12976348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.