ArticleOecologia2026
Life-stage niche partitioning and functional strategies promote predatory coccinellids' co-occurrence.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species coexistence is shaped by how individuals share limiting resources such as space, food, and shelter. Theory predicts that niche differentiation promotes coexistence, depending on habitat characteristics, behavioral traits, and the intensity of competition. Niche use may vary across life stages, as ontogenetic shifts alter habitat use and species interactions. We investigated habitat segregation, niche overlap, and the role of non-crop vegetation in affecting coccinellid coexistence across life stages through semi-controlled experiments and field sampling at 42 sites. Species showed consistent differences in habitat and microhabitat use across developmental stages, influenced by innate behaviors and plastic responses to interspecific interactions. Superior competitors (Hippodamia convergens and Harmonia axyridis) generally dominated prey-rich crop areas during egg, larval, and adult stages, but shifted to sheltered sites outside the plants during pupation. In contrast, Eriopis connexa used soil microhabitats throughout its life cycle, reducing niche overlap with other species. Cycloneda sanguinea, a competitively inferior species, persisted by exploiting non-crop plants, which increased spatial heterogeneity and resource availability. Non-crop vegetation thus promoted coexistence by enabling spatial segregation and reducing presumed competitive asymmetries across life stages. These patterns highlight how the strength of species interactions and spatial partitioning changes ontogenetically, reflecting both behavioral flexibility and the influence of habitat features. We propose a plastic functional classification of species based on their behavioral responses to potential competition-risk scenarios across life stages, ranging from risk-tolerant generalists to conditional risk-avoiders and niche-fidelity strategists, that could be broadened and adapted to other study systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.