Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617821›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dynamic graph convolution with comprehensive pruning and GNN classification for precise lymph node metastasis detection.

Chaitra H N, Shwetha N, Adarsh Rag S, Chandra Singh, Rangaswamy Y

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaitra H NDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Don Bosco Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India.
Shwetha NDepartment of Electronics and Communication, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India.
Adarsh Rag SManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. adarsh.rs@manipal.edu.
Chandra SinghDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Nitte (Deemed to be University), NMAM Institute of Technology Nitte, Mangalore, India.
Rangaswamy YDepartment of Electronics and Communication, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early and accurate detection of lymph node metastases is crucial for improving breast cancer patient outcomes. However, current clinical practices, including CT, PET imaging, and microscopic examination, are time-consuming and prone to errors due to low tissue contrast, varying lymph node sizes, and complex workflows. To address the limitations of existing approaches in lymph node segmentation, feature embedding, and classification, this study proposes a novel framework Graph-Pruned Lymph Node Detection Framework (GPLN-DF) that integrates a Dynamic Graph Convolution (DGC) autoencoder with Node Attribute-wise Attention (NodeAttri-Attention) for accurate lymph node segmentation. This segmentation is further refined using Comprehensive Graph Gradual Pruning (CGP) to reduce unnecessary parameters and computational costs. After segmentation, Hessian-based Locally Linear Embedding (HLLE) is applied for effective feature extraction and dimensionality reduction, preserving the geometric structure of lymph node regions. Finally, a Graph Neural Network (GNN) classifier enhanced with CGP is used to classify the segmented lymph nodes as metastatic or non-metastatic based on the extracted features. This comprehensive framework addresses challenges such as small lymph node size, shape variability, low contrast in medical imaging, and high computational burden. The model was evaluated on the CAMELYON17 dataset, achieving a classification accuracy of 98.65%, surpassing existing models in segmentation precision and classification performance.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesAlgorithmsFemaleGraph Neural NetworksHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedDynamic graph convolutionEmbeddingLymph nodePruningSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41617821
PMCPMC12913665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.