ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic graph convolution with comprehensive pruning and GNN classification for precise lymph node metastasis detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate detection of lymph node metastases is crucial for improving breast cancer patient outcomes. However, current clinical practices, including CT, PET imaging, and microscopic examination, are time-consuming and prone to errors due to low tissue contrast, varying lymph node sizes, and complex workflows. To address the limitations of existing approaches in lymph node segmentation, feature embedding, and classification, this study proposes a novel framework Graph-Pruned Lymph Node Detection Framework (GPLN-DF) that integrates a Dynamic Graph Convolution (DGC) autoencoder with Node Attribute-wise Attention (NodeAttri-Attention) for accurate lymph node segmentation. This segmentation is further refined using Comprehensive Graph Gradual Pruning (CGP) to reduce unnecessary parameters and computational costs. After segmentation, Hessian-based Locally Linear Embedding (HLLE) is applied for effective feature extraction and dimensionality reduction, preserving the geometric structure of lymph node regions. Finally, a Graph Neural Network (GNN) classifier enhanced with CGP is used to classify the segmented lymph nodes as metastatic or non-metastatic based on the extracted features. This comprehensive framework addresses challenges such as small lymph node size, shape variability, low contrast in medical imaging, and high computational burden. The model was evaluated on the CAMELYON17 dataset, achieving a classification accuracy of 98.65%, surpassing existing models in segmentation precision and classification performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.