Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617819›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Balancing noise reduction and neural signature preservation in EEG biometrics.

Muhammad Usman, Nadia Sultan, Ammara Nasim, Beenish Ayaz, Joddat Fatima, Faryal Nosheen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad UsmanCenter of Excellence in AI (CoE-AI), Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nadia SultanCenter of Excellence in AI (CoE-AI), Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ammara NasimCenter of Excellence in AI (CoE-AI), Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Beenish AyazDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK. beenish.ayaz@rhul.ac.uk.
Joddat FatimaCenter of Excellence in AI (CoE-AI), Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Faryal NosheenDepartment of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EEG-based subject identification is an emerging biometric approach with strong potential for secure authentication, but reliable performance requires optimisation of the entire processing pipeline. The key difficulty lies in improving signal quality while preserving the subtle neural signatures that uniquely distinguish individuals . In this study, we propose a complete framework that integrates lenient preprocessing, spectral feature extraction, and ensemble classification. Using the Brain Encoding Dataset(BED), we evaluated three data variants: raw EEG recordings, signals processed with a modified Pre-processing (PREP) pipeline using relaxed thresholds, and expert-curated pre-extracted features. All datasets were analyzed with mel-frequency cepstral coefficients(MFCC), and classification was performed within an ensemble architecture that combined decision trees, random forests, support vector machines, and XGBoost. The experiments covered 21 subjects, 33 sessions, and twelve stimulus conditions including resting state, cognitive tasks, and visual evoked potentials. XGBoost achieved peak accuracy of 98.00% using Visual Evoked Potential Complex stimulation at 10 Hz on cleaned data, representing a 5.3% improvement over raw signals and an 8.4% improvement over pre-extracted features. Statistical validation confirmed that these improvements are robust across all experimental conditions at ([Formula: see text]). Cross-session evaluation further demonstrated the expected temporal variability in EEG-based biometrics but showed that the proposed pipeline improves robustness compared with both raw and conventionally processed data, with Rest Closed Eyes emerging as the most stable paradigm. These findings establish a principled framework for EEG-based subject identification and provide practical guidelines for optimizing preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and stimulus paradigms for real-world deployment with consumer-grade hardware and system approach.

Indexed as

Biometric IdentificationBiometryBrainElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleRandom ForestSupport Vector MachineBED datasetBiometric authenticationEEGMachine learningMFCCPREPRandom forestSubject identification

Identifiers

PMID41617819
PMCPMC12914031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.