ArticleScientific reports2026
Three dimensional palatal morphology and dentoalveolar differences after extraction and non extraction treatment in class II malocclusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of Orthodontic Extraction Decisions Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital technologies have transformed orthodontics by enabling precise three-dimensional (3D) assessment of treatment outcomes; however, the effects of extraction versus non-extraction strategies on palatal morphology in Class II malocclusions remain underexplored. This study quantified segmental palatal volume and surface changes, along with skeletal-dentoalveolar outcomes, using digital model analysis integrated with cephalometrics. Records of 69 post-pubertal patients treated with fixed appliances (Class II, n = 34; Class I controls, n = 35) were retrospectively analyzed, each subdivided into extraction and non-extraction protocols. Maxillary casts were scanned with Sirona inEos X5 and segmented in Materialise 3-Matic to compute palatal volume and surface area, while cephalometric variables were derived from lateral radiographs (Dolphin Imaging). Group comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests (p < 0.05). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify dentoalveolar predictors of palatal remodeling. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent, as indicated by a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC ≥ 0.90). Skeletal changes were minimal and comparable across groups. Dentoalveolar findings demonstrated significant maxillary incisor protrusion in non-extraction protocols and retrusion in extraction protocols (p < 0.05). Anterior palatal volume and surface area increased across all groups. Overall, measurable differences in total palatal volume and surface area were observed between extraction and non-extraction treatment strategies. Regression analyses indicated that sagittal dentoalveolar displacement was associated with palatal remodeling, whereas angular and vertical dental variables showed limited independent influence. Extraction and non-extraction treatment protocols were associated with measurable differences in three-dimensional palatal volume and surface area, reflecting distinct dentoalveolar and palatal remodeling patterns between treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.