ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma through integrated bioinformatics analysis and real time PCR validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exosomes and lung cancer: Biogenesis, pathogenic mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic applications.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Graphene Oxide (GO) and Gold Nanoparticles (AuNP) Facilitated Electrochemical Biosensing for Lung Cancer Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the US with a 5-year survival rate of 17%. Non-small cell lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma, prevails. Therefore, early detection and biomarker discovery are extremely important. This study uses deep learning to find new biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma. RNA-Seq data from 522 samples, including 506 lung adenocarcinoma patients and 16 healthy controls, were analyzed. DEGs were identified after strict preprocessing, and deep learning algorithms predicted markers. Functional annotation, pathway, and protein interaction analyses elucidated the biological importance of DEGs. Clinical relevance was assessed by correlation with clinical parameters and survival analysis. External validation was carried out using GDAC and GEO datasets. Blood samples from 30 lung adenocarcinoma patients and 30 healthy people were analyzed by real-time PCR to validate the expression levels of key genes. Among 522 participants(506 cases, 16 controls), the mean age was 62.95 ± 15.71 years. Normalized data showed 3,513 DEGs. The deep learning model had a predictive accuracy of 98.44%, Brier score (probability MSE) = 0.0013, and AUC of 1.0. CYP3A7 had the highest effect size. ROC analysis found diagnostic genes A2M, CYP2C9, and SIRPD (Ensembl ID: 128646) with a sensitivity of 0.96. Real-time PCR showed upregulated CYP2C9, KRT14, and PECAM1 and downregulated A2M in patients compared to controls(P < 0.001). Bioinformatics-identified genes are potential markers for early lung adenocarcinoma detection and management. RT-PCR validation shows AI's effectiveness in identifying biomarkers, enabling prompt treatment to halt disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.