ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of heavy metal contamination in coastal aquifer groundwater of Alappuzha district (Kerala, India) using OSPRC framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trace amounts of certain heavy metals, including iron, zinc, and copper, are essential for human health; however, many others are toxic even at low concentrations, posing significant risks in vulnerable coastal regions. This study assessed concentrations of heavy metals in shallow groundwater (1–4 m depth) along the coastline of Alappuzha, Kerala (India) during the pre- (2021) and post-monsoon (2022) seasons, applying the Origin-Source-Pathways-Receptor-Consequence (OSPRC) framework. Concentrations of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), strontium (Sr), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), barium (Ba), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), aluminum (Al), manganese (Mn), and cobalt (Co) were analyzed with respect to the WHO (2017) standards. Arsenic in 8–10% samples and aluminum in 8% samples across the seasons, exceeding the WHO limits, were largely from commercial debris, agricultural runoff, domestic sewage, and tourism-related activities. The elevated iron (4–8% of samples), however, was predominantly geogenic. The heavy metal pollution index (HMPI) indicated that 32% of pre-monsoon and 34% of post-monsoon samples exhibited medium to high pollution levels with the critical hotspots at Ambalapuzha, Anandheswaram, and Thottapalli for arsenic; Alappuzha, Kanjikuzhi and Paravoor for aluminum; and Paravoor, Alappuzha, Chennakari, and Ambalapuzha for iron. The presence of these trace metals at unsafe levels underscores an urgent need for comprehensive quality monitoring and mitigation strategies in this coastal zone. The findings in this study deliver a replicable model for integrating risk-based assessment frameworks like OSPRC into groundwater management practices for policymakers, public health authorities, and local communities to prioritize interventions for developing sustainable and long-term solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.