Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617768›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Effect of solid-state polymerization on fiber structure development in melt spinning of mechanical recycled PET.

Hyelim Kim, Jong Hyuk Bae, Wan-Gyu Hahm, Wonyoung Jeong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyelim KimTextile Innovation R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hyuk BaeTextile Innovation R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Republic of Korea.
Wan-Gyu HahmTextile Innovation R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Republic of Korea.
Wonyoung JeongTextile Innovation R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Republic of Korea. wyjeong@kitech.re.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy RS-2024-00432901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the feasibility of producing industrial PET filament fibers from mechanically recycled PET (mr-PET) and aimed to establish the optimal solid-state polymerization (SSP) and melt-spinning conditions required for their manufacture. Virgin PET (v-PET) and mr-PET with the same intrinsic viscosity (IV) were selected and subjected to SSP at temperatures of 220, 230, and 240 °C for 6, 12, and 18 h. Among the samples with similar IV (~ 1.1 dL/g), the 230 °C–6 h sample was selected for melt spinning due to its comparable molecular weight(MW) and IV, as well as process efficiency. Melt spinning was performed at 285 °C, and the PET filament fibers were obtained at specified take-up velocities. WAXD analysis showed that crystalline structures formed at a take-up velocity of 4000 m/min in samples before SSP, whereas in samples after SSP, crystallization occurred at 3000 m/min. As the take-up velocity increased, the tenacity of both pre- and post-SSP samples tended to increase. When mr-PET that underwent SSP was spun at 3000 m/min, its tenacity was comparable to that of v-PET under the same conditions. Therefore, industrial PET filament fibers with properties comparable to v-PET can be produced from mr-PET under optimized SSP and melt-spinning conditions.

Indexed as

Crystal structureHigh-speed melt spinningMechanically recycled PET (mr-PET)Recycled PET filament fiberSolid-state polymerization (SSP)

Identifiers

PMID41617768
PMCPMC12913902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.