ArticleScientific reports2026
Hydrodynamic response of an Antarctic glacial bay to cross-bay winds and its potential impact on primary production.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antarctic glacial bays are important, productive regions of the Southern Ocean. Certain glacial bays, including our research area, Admiralty Bay, are less favorable for phytoplankton growth due to wind-enhanced high energy levels, but they still host localized biological blooms. Westerly winds are predominant in Admiralty Bay; the strongest storms are from the east. These winds act perpendicular to the main axis of the bay. This study investigates the impact of cross-bay winds on the bay’s hydrodynamics and its potential effects on primary production. A hydrodynamic model, coupled with a Lagrangian model tracking potential iron sources, was run under seven wind scenarios. Results indicate that all winds reduce water column stratification, but energy increase rates and circulation pattern shifts vary with wind direction. Westerly winds restrict outflow and promote the formation of submesoscale eddies near inner inlet openings, concentrating water masses that are expected to be iron-rich, potentially stimulating phytoplankton growth. Conversely, easterly winds enhance outflow, flushing bay waters and likely negatively impacting productivity. Limited observational and satellite-derived biological data provide supportive evidence for the model-based hypothesis that the direction of cross-bay winds, rather than just their magnitude, significantly influences local productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.