ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatiotemporal assessment of maize evapotranspiration and surface energy fluxes under varying irrigation regimes using UAV based METRIC.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evapotranspiration (ET) is a key component of the hydrological cycle and is critical for determining crop water requirements. Accurate ET estimation is essential for improving irrigation efficiency, particularly under increasing water scarcity and climate variability. Conventional approaches such as the soil water balance, empirical formulations, the FAO Penman-Monteith method, eddy covariance flux towers, lysimeters, and scintillometers each have limitations related to spatial representativeness, accuracy, or operational cost. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with multispectral and thermal sensors offer a high spatial resolution and cost-effective alternative for field-scale assessment of surface energy balance components and ET. In this study, a field experiment was conducted on maize during rabi season of 2022-23 under two irrigation regimes based on depletion of available soil moisture (20% DASM and 40% DASM). UAV-based multispectral (0.05 m) and thermal imagery (0.33 m) were acquired at five crop growth stages and processed using the Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution with Internalized Calibration (METRIC) model to estimate actual evapotranspiration (ETa) and surface energy fluxes. Spatiotemporal analysis showed that the 20% DASM treatment (400 mm) resulted in a 1.7 °C lower land surface temperature, a 16.5% higher NDVI, and an 11% increase in daily ETa compared with the 40% DASM treatment (316 mm), which experienced water stress and a 20% reduction in seasonal ETa. The UAV-based METRIC estimates of daily ETa showed strong agreement with that of Penman-Monteith (PM) combination approach (R² = 0.84; RMSE = 0.22 mm day⁻¹; MAPE = 6.1%), with a slight underestimation of seasonal ETa (-7%). Agreement with the soil water balance method ranged from - 3% to + 3%, demonstrating the capability of the approach to capture irrigation-induced variability in ETa and surface energy fluxes. Overall, the results highlight the potential of UAV-based METRIC for spatiotemporal assessment of crop evapotranspiration and surface energy dynamics to support precision irrigation management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.