ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanical and durability performance prediction of geopolymer incorporating ferrosilicon slag and aluminum powder using machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study explores the mechanical, durability, and environmental performance of geopolymer concrete (GPC) synthesized using ferrosilicon slag (FS) and aluminum powder (AP) as sustainable binder constituents. Eight mixes were prepared by varying FS: AP ratios (100:0, 95:5, 90:10, 85:15) and activating them with 6 M and 9 M sodium hydroxide at a constant activator-to-binder ratio. Experimental tests included compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths, water sorptivity, and rapid chloride penetration (RCPT). Results showed that increasing AP content improved workability up to an optimum of 10%, after which excessive porosity reduced strength. The 90% FS–10% AP mix at 9 M NaOH (M7) achieved the highest performance, yielding 53.2% higher compressive strength, 23.8% higher flexural strength, and 24.0% higher split tensile strength than the corresponding 6 M mix. Durability also improved significantly, with sorptivity reduced by 25.0% and RCPT charge by 52.9% at higher molarity. Machine learning (ML) models artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF), and support vector regression (SVR) were trained to predict compressive strength, with RF achieving the best accuracy (R2 = 0.98). A cradle-to-gate carbon footprint analysis demonstrated that AP-free mixes had the lowest embodied CO2, whereas the optimal M7 mix provided the best balance between performance and sustainability. Overall, the study highlights the synergistic potential of FS and AP in geopolymer concretes and provides an integrated experimental–ML–carbon framework for designing high-performance, low-carbon GPC mixtures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.