Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617735›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Mechanical and durability performance prediction of geopolymer incorporating ferrosilicon slag and aluminum powder using machine learning techniques.

K Narshimha Raju, G K Arunvivek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K Narshimha RajuDepartment of Civil Engineering, Mohan Babu University, Tirupati, India. kothapallipdtr@gmail.com.
G K ArunvivekDepartment of Civil Engineering, Mohan Babu University, Tirupati, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study explores the mechanical, durability, and environmental performance of geopolymer concrete (GPC) synthesized using ferrosilicon slag (FS) and aluminum powder (AP) as sustainable binder constituents. Eight mixes were prepared by varying FS: AP ratios (100:0, 95:5, 90:10, 85:15) and activating them with 6 M and 9 M sodium hydroxide at a constant activator-to-binder ratio. Experimental tests included compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths, water sorptivity, and rapid chloride penetration (RCPT). Results showed that increasing AP content improved workability up to an optimum of 10%, after which excessive porosity reduced strength. The 90% FS–10% AP mix at 9 M NaOH (M7) achieved the highest performance, yielding 53.2% higher compressive strength, 23.8% higher flexural strength, and 24.0% higher split tensile strength than the corresponding 6 M mix. Durability also improved significantly, with sorptivity reduced by 25.0% and RCPT charge by 52.9% at higher molarity. Machine learning (ML) models artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF), and support vector regression (SVR) were trained to predict compressive strength, with RF achieving the best accuracy (R2 = 0.98). A cradle-to-gate carbon footprint analysis demonstrated that AP-free mixes had the lowest embodied CO2, whereas the optimal M7 mix provided the best balance between performance and sustainability. Overall, the study highlights the synergistic potential of FS and AP in geopolymer concretes and provides an integrated experimental–ML–carbon framework for designing high-performance, low-carbon GPC mixtures.

Indexed as

Aluminum powderFerrosilicon slagGeopolymer concreteMachine learningStrength prediction

Identifiers

PMID41617735
PMCPMC12864812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.