ArticleScientific reports2026
Improving the value of population health data for health policy and decision-making using machine learning algorithms in EQ-5D-5L index estimation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate patient-level EQ-5D-5L index scores using routinely collected sociodemographic and Minimum European Health Module (MEHM) data from seven extensive population surveys (N = 9,324). Fourteen machine learning (ML) models were compared in five research scenarios using the recently developed G score. Based on the performance ranking shown across scenarios, AdaBoost emerged as the best model (mean rank 2.87), followed by Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and XGBoost (mean ranks 2.94 and 3.60, respectively). AdaBoost achieved the best results when no imputation was done and both sociodemographic and MEHM data were included (G = 0.955), but its performance declined when the estimation was based solely on sociodemographics (G = 0.871). The results confirm that the EQ-5D-5L index can be well predicted from existing statistical data using ML methods and that the MEHM improves the estimation. Our findings also highlight the potentially undesirable effects of data imputation in ML-based estimations. The methods presented in this study enhance the usability of existing health data, giving analysts and decision-makers a practical way to populate health-economic evaluations when primary data collection is impractical or impossible. Nonetheless, even advanced ML algorithms have limitations, so direct EQ-5D-5L data collection should remain the preferred approach whenever feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.