ArticleNature communications2026
Dual promoter-enhancer activities reflect a unified regulatory logic.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Decoding the regulatory grammar of human gene promoters.Cell research · 2026Article
- Intrinsic promoter responsiveness dictates sensitivity to transcriptional activation by enhancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SMARCD1 and Its Functional Relevance in SWI/SNF and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that both putative promoters and enhancers can exert dual promoter and enhancer functions. However, how these activities are related within individual elements and what determines this dual functionality remain poorly understood. We developed a massively parallel dual reporter assay that enables simultaneous assessment of the intrinsic promoter and enhancer potential exerted by the same sequence. Parallel quantification for thousands of elements reveals that canonical human promoters and enhancers can act as both promoters and enhancers under the same contexts, and that promoter activity may be necessary but not sufficient for enhancer function. Perturbations to element transcription factor binding motifs lead to disruptions in both activities, implicating a shared syntax for the two regulatory functions. Combinations of elements with different minimal promoters reveal reciprocal activity modulation, which, together with a strong correlation between promoter and enhancer functions, imply a bidirectional feedback loop to sustain environments of high transcriptional activity. Finally, we validate this reciprocity and correlation in situ using CRISPR activation at the human β-globin locus. Our approach reveals that the functional convergence between promoters and enhancers arises from a shared regulatory logic and sequence syntax, advancing a unified model for regulatory element biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.