ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
The relationship between regular substance use and cost comparisons in stable and volatile learning contexts.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insensitivity to costs during cost-benefit decision-making consistently has been related to substance use severity. However, little work has manipulated cost information to examine how people evaluate and compare multiple costs. Further, no work has examined how the consideration of cost information varies across different contexts. We administered a new loss-frame variant of a probabilistic learning task in a diverse community sample enriched for substance use (N = 137). Individuals with more years of regular substance use tended not to repeat choices after they avoided losses, choosing similarly regardless of whether they had avoided or incurred a loss. Computational modeling parameters indicated that they were more inconsistent in their use of expected values to guide choice. These results contribute to our conceptualization of substance use severity by suggesting that inconsistency in using cost information, rather than insensitivity to costs, may inform choices to continue using substances despite incurring negative consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.