ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Manipulating speech perception with amplitude-modulated kilohertz magnetic perturbation (AM-kTMP).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Segregating important stimuli from distractors is crucial for successful speech perception. Neural activity synchronized to speech, also termed "neural speech tracking," is thought to be instrumental for this purpose. However, whether neural tracking of targets and distractors both play a similarly important role for speech perception in a setting with multiple competing speakers is rarely examined. In 61 human participants (30 males, 31 females), we used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to presumably manipulate neural tracking of two simultaneously presented sequences of rhythmic speech while participants attended to one of them. A random temporal relationship between speech streams allowed us to disentangle effects of tACS on target and distractor processing and to examine their combined effect on a behavioral measure of speech perception. We found that the phase relation between tACS and both target and distracting speech modulated word report accuracy to a similar degree. This effect was observed during bilateral tACS over auditory regions and the inferior frontal gyrus and, importantly, in a control "shunt" group that received near-identical cutaneous stimulation but ∼50% reduced brain stimulation. These results imply that, although tACS phase modulates the perception of both target and distracting speech, the cutaneous stimulation accompanying tACS can induce phase effects in speech perception that resemble those observed with conventional tACS. Our finding illustrates the urgent need to control for cutaneous stimulation in tACS studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.