Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617605›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception.

Jules Erkens, Ram K Pari, Marina Inyutina, Mathieu Marx, Florian H Kasten, Benedikt Zoefel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jules ErkensUniversité de Toulouse, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), Toulouse 31100, France jules.erkens@cnrs.fr benedikt.zoefel@cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5994-5795
Ram K PariUniversité de Toulouse, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), Toulouse 31100, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1689-737X
Marina InyutinaUniversité de Toulouse, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), Toulouse 31100, France.
Mathieu MarxUniversité de Toulouse, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), Toulouse 31100, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8295-8885
Florian H KastenUniversité de Toulouse, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), Toulouse 31100, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2320-6939
Benedikt ZoefelUniversité de Toulouse, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), Toulouse 31100, France jules.erkens@cnrs.fr benedikt.zoefel@cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9800-2551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segregating important stimuli from distractors is crucial for successful speech perception. Neural activity synchronized to speech, also termed "neural speech tracking," is thought to be instrumental for this purpose. However, whether neural tracking of targets and distractors both play a similarly important role for speech perception in a setting with multiple competing speakers is rarely examined. In 61 human participants (30 males, 31 females), we used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to presumably manipulate neural tracking of two simultaneously presented sequences of rhythmic speech while participants attended to one of them. A random temporal relationship between speech streams allowed us to disentangle effects of tACS on target and distractor processing and to examine their combined effect on a behavioral measure of speech perception. We found that the phase relation between tACS and both target and distracting speech modulated word report accuracy to a similar degree. This effect was observed during bilateral tACS over auditory regions and the inferior frontal gyrus and, importantly, in a control "shunt" group that received near-identical cutaneous stimulation but ∼50% reduced brain stimulation. These results imply that, although tACS phase modulates the perception of both target and distracting speech, the cutaneous stimulation accompanying tACS can induce phase effects in speech perception that resemble those observed with conventional tACS. Our finding illustrates the urgent need to control for cutaneous stimulation in tACS studies.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultneural oscillationsneural trackingspeech perceptionstream segregationtranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Identifiers

PMID41617605
PMCPMC12962778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.