Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026
Double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot study of trigeminal nerve stimulation for autism spectrum disorder.
Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06233279 (Single-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Clinical Trials for Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Symptoms Related to Autism Spectrum Disorder Using NuEyne P01 in Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Single-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Clinical Trials for Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Symptoms Related to Autism Spectrum Disorder Using NuEyne P01 in Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) is a minimal-risk, noninvasive neuromodulation method with growing evidence of efficacy across psychiatric conditions. However, its safety and potential effects in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) remain underexplored. This exploratory pilot study aimed primarily to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and secondarily to explore changes in ASD-related symptoms - including impairments in social communication and reciprocity, attention, executive functioning, emotional regulation, sleep, and sensory processing - in children with ASD, and to examine associated changes using quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). This double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized exploratory pilot trial enrolled 29 children aged 7-12 years with ASD. The participants were randomized to receive 28 nightly sessions of active or sham TNS over 4 weeks. At baseline and week 4, we assessed safety, clinical outcomes and Clinical Global Impression scales, in addition to analyzing qEEG band power. No serious adverse events were observed, and TNS was well tolerated. Exploratory analyses showed nominal between-group differences (unadjusted) favoring the TNS group in maladaptive behavior (Vineland-II: 1.38 vs 0.08; p = .017) and social reciprocity (Social Responsiveness Scale-2: 12.07 vs -1.43; p = .025). Exploratory qEEG analyses revealed decreased gamma/high-frequency and increased alpha power in the left frontal and parietal regions, changes that significantly correlated with improvements in social (r = -0.917; p = .001) and overall (r = -0.680; p = .030) functioning. TNS was safe and showed preliminary evidence of potential benefits in improving behavioral and social functioning in children with ASD. Larger trials are required to confirm these findings. Clinical trial registration information: http://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT06233279.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.