Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617412›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2026

Family Medicine Residency Match Is Not a "Field of Dreams".

Morgan Stickler, W Mitchel Shaver, Adam M Franks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Morgan SticklerFrom the Department of Family & Community Health, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, West Virginia (MS, MS, AMF).
W Mitchel ShaverFrom the Department of Family & Community Health, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, West Virginia (MS, MS, AMF).
Adam M FranksFrom the Department of Family & Community Health, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, West Virginia (MS, MS, AMF). franks@marshall.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workforce projections predict a significant lack of primary care providers nationally. Increased family medicine residency programs and positions have been celebrated as the answer to these projections. Since 2012, the number of positions offered annually has increased almost 2-fold from 2,740 to 5,357. While this has the potential to help alleviate this disaster, very few are questioning the unintended consequences of additional family medicine positions. Over this same 14-year period, the number of programs failing to fill in the National Residency Match Program have increased 4.5-fold (64 to 288) with the number of unfilled slots increasing over 5.5-fold (142 to 805). Linear rates of change for unfilled residency programs per every 1,000 residency positions created have increased from 0.4 prior to 2018 to 69.3 between 2018 and 2021 to 271.5 after 2021. Unfilled programs experience multiple negative consequences including reputation damage and increase coverage responsibilities. Further addition of family medicine training position volume is therefore likely harmful to existing programs. Better solutions should be explored to creatively increase student interest in family medicine by emphasizing and leveraging the value of family medicine physicians and primary care.

Indexed as

Family PracticeInternship and ResidencyCareer ChoiceHumansPrimary Health CareUnited StatesFamily MedicineFamily PhysiciansPrimary Health CareResidencyWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID41617412
PMCPMC12978802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.