Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617408›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2026

A Retrospective Analysis of Soft Tissue Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Primary Care.

David Killeen, Frances Shofer, Nova Panebianco, Gwen Baraniecki-Zwil, Jeffery Kramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David KilleenFrom the Neighborhood Health, Alexandria, VA (DK); and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (FS, NP, GW-Z, JK). davidkilleenmd@gmail.com.
Frances ShoferFrom the Neighborhood Health, Alexandria, VA (DK); and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (FS, NP, GW-Z, JK).
Nova PanebiancoFrom the Neighborhood Health, Alexandria, VA (DK); and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (FS, NP, GW-Z, JK).
Gwen Baraniecki-ZwilFrom the Neighborhood Health, Alexandria, VA (DK); and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (FS, NP, GW-Z, JK).
Jeffery KramerFrom the Neighborhood Health, Alexandria, VA (DK); and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (FS, NP, GW-Z, JK).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSoft tissue concerns are common, yet most primary care physicians must refer patients to radiology for further imaging, leading to potential delays in diagnosis and management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly available in primary care and has been shown to improve clinical decision making. However, current Family Medicine POCUS curricula focus primarily on cellulitis and abscess, overlooking other common soft tissue pathologies. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of soft tissue pathologies and associated follow-up recommendations on comprehensive radiology ultrasound exams ordered by Family Medicine physicians.

methodsA retrospective study of radiology-performed comprehensive ultrasound exams ordered by an academic urban Family Medicine practice over the course of the 2019 was performed. Data collected included patient demographics, ultrasound findings, anatomic location, and follow-up recommendations. Diagnoses were categorized, and time from order to completion was calculated.

resultsSoft tissue ultrasounds comprised 10% (n = 168) of all ultrasound studies ordered. The most common diagnosis were lymph nodes, n = 44 (25%), lipomas n = 32 (18%), and no lesion/normal n = 23 (13%). Only 2 studies diagnosed abscess (1%). The median time from order date to completion was 6 days (IQR 2 to 22 days), with 48% waiting over a week. Half (51%) of studies required no further follow up, while 26% required additional imaging or biopsy. DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the need for expanded Family Medicine POCUS training to include high-yield diagnoses such as lipomas, lymph nodes, and cysts. POCUS could reduce unnecessary referrals, expedite care, and improve diagnostic confidence. Future research should explore primary care-specific POCUS protocols and their impact on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Family PracticePoint-of-Care SystemsPrimary Health CareAbscessAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyFamily MedicineMedical EducationPOCUSPoint-of-Care SystemsPrimary Health CareRadiologySoft Tissue NeoplasmsTechnologyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41617408
PMCPMC12978785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.