Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617360›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2026

Reducing delays in time-critical medications for Parkinson's disease: a multifaceted, multiprofessional quality improvement project.

James Fisher, Charlotte Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James FisherSchool of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK james.fisher@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4886-6060
Charlotte ScottNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When people with Parkinson's disease (PD) are admitted to hospital, control of their symptoms can deteriorate, often due to delayed or incorrect medication administration. The aim of this project was to improve the administration of PD medicines for hospital in-patients in our trust. Specifically, we aimed to administer 95% of PD medicines within 30 minutes of the prescribed time and to eliminate delays of >60 minutes for PD medications.To achieve these aims, we developed a multifaceted quality improvement project, led by a multidisciplinary team, that ran over a period of 2 years. The outcome measure in this project was the time delay between the time a given PD medicine was scheduled to be administered and the time at which it was recorded as having been administered by nursing staff.The data were divided into 3 phases: a 6-month baseline phase (March 2022 to September 2022), a 24-month project phase (September 2022 to September 2024) and a 6-month sustain phase (September 2024 to March 2025). Statistical process control (SPC) charts were used to monitor medicine delays over time. Plan-do-study-act methodology was adopted within this project and a variety of interventions were employed throughout the project.The project demonstrated a significant reduction in delays in medicines administration for patients with PD. The success of our project came from the cultivation of multiprofessional 'ownership' of the problem, in combination with an appreciation of the patient's lived experience, through visualisation of how poor symptom control can impact on a person's ability to move. Whilst it is not possible to comment on the long-term sustainability of the project, we were encouraged that the changes were maintained throughout the 6-month sustain phase for both medicine administration targets.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsParkinson DiseaseHumansQuality ImprovementTime FactorsTreatment DelayAntiparkinson AgentsGeriatricsHealthcare quality improvementMedication safetyQuality improvementTime-to-Treatment

Identifiers

PMID41617360
PMCPMC12863335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.