ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2026
First-year real-world outcomes of faricimab in clinically significant diabetic macular oedema: a Swiss retina research network report.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world outcomes of faricimab in treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema: The Middle East perspective.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsEvaluate the efficacy and safety of faricimab for treatment-naïve and pre-treated diabetic macular oedema (DME) in a real-world setting.
methodsThis multicentre, retrospective cohort study examined consecutive DME patients treated with faricimab for ≥1 year. Data were collected at predefined time points. Primary outcomes were mean changes in corrected visual acuity (VA), centre-point retinal thickness (CRT) and central subfield thickness (CST) and treatment intervals and adverse events (AEs).
results184 eyes with DME were included: 61 (33.2%) were treatment-naïve, and 123 (66.8%) were pretreated. In treatment-naïve eyes, VA improved from 69.7±15 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at baseline to 73.9±14.1 after 12 months (p=0.014), while it remained stable in pretreated eyes (71.2±14.2 vs 73.0±12.9; p=0.14). CST decreased significantly in both groups (treatment-naïve (366.1±108.3 µm to 316.4±113.5 µm, p<0.001); pretreated (339.1±93.1 µm to 298.3±65.8 µm, p<0.001)). Thirty-one percent of naïve eyes and 21.1% of pretreated eyes were completely dry after 12 months. In treatment-naïve eyes, the mean treatment interval was 12.7±6.4 weeks at 12 months. In pretreated eyes, the interval increased from 6.0±3.0 to 7.8±3.6 weeks (p<0.001). Over 12 months, 8.1±2.1 and 9.4±2.5 injections were administered to naïve and pretreated eyes, respectively (p<0.001). Of the five recorded AEs, two cases of non-infectious intraocular inflammation and one cerebrovascular event were reported.
conclusionOver 12 months, faricimab demonstrated good efficacy and safety in both treatment-naïve and pretreated eyes with DME. There was a reduction in CST and improved VA in treatment-naïve eyes and stable VA in pretreated eyes. The low number of AEs supports a favourable risk-benefit profile of faricimab in a real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.