Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617245›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2026

Compliance With England's Calorie Labeling Regulations 3 Years After Policy Implementation.

Oliver Huse, Alexandra Kalbus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oliver HusePopulation Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9366-8012
Alexandra KalbusPopulation Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7388-7074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined compliance with England's calorie labeling regulations, which require large out-of-home food businesses to display the calories of prepared food and drink at the point of choice, such as menus. By using website data from large out-of-home food businesses, we found that all businesses (n = 77) provided calorie labeling somewhere on their websites. However, fewer than half (48%; n = 37) did not provide calorie labels on the default menu (ie, the first menu that a consumer is likely to see). Compliance with the policy's implementation guidance was greatest for the label's position (81%; n = 62) and lowest for prominent formatting (40%; n = 31), while 71% (n = 55) of businesses provided the statement of daily calorie needs. We observed differences among types of out-of-home food businesses, but we did not test them because of the small sample size. Our results suggest imperfect adherence to England's calorie labeling regulations, thus undermining the policy's impact. As the policy's review approaches, policy makers should consider strategies for ensuring compliance.

Indexed as

calorie labelingfood environmentfood policynutritionpolicy evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41617245
PMCPMC12861396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.