ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit: Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning models to predict venous thromboembolism in sepsis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for predicting venous thromboembolism in septic shock patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Development, Validation, and Deployment of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for In-Hospital Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Patients with COPD and Sepsis: A Multicenter Cohort Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Investigating risk factors and developing a predictive model for venous thromboembolism in patients with sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and severe complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis. Conventional risk stratification tools lack sepsis-specific features and may inadequately capture complex, nonlinear interactions among clinical variables.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for the early prediction of VTE in ICU patients with sepsis.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database for model development and internal validation, and an independent cohort from Changshu Hospital for external validation. Candidate predictors were selected through univariate analysis, followed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Retained variables were used in multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors, which were then used to develop 9 ML models, including categorical boosting, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, light gradient boosting machine, logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, naive Bayes, random forest, and support vector machine. Performance was evaluated by discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]), calibration, and clinical use (decision curve analysis). A subgroup analysis stratified by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was conducted in the external cohort to assess model stability across sepsis severity levels. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to quantify the contribution of features to the predicted risk.
resultsA total of 25,197 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV cohort and 328 patients from the external cohort were included, with VTE incidences of 844 out of 25,197 (3.4%) and 30 out of 328 (9.2%), respectively. The light gradient boosting machine model performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.956 in internal validation. Despite the higher VTE incidence and clinical severity in the external validation, the model maintained robust generalization with an AUC of 0.786. Notably, the model achieved enhanced discriminative ability in the severe sepsis subgroup (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score >6) with an AUC of 0.816, compared with 0.769 in the mild to moderate sepsis subgroup. Calibration curves indicated strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, and decision curve analysis showed superior net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. SHAP analysis identified central venous catheterization, serum chloride and bicarbonate levels, arterial catheterization, and prolonged partial thromboplastin time as the most influential predictors. Partial dependence plots revealed both linear and nonlinear associations between these variables and VTE risk. Individual-level force plots further enhanced interpretability by visualizing personalized risk profiles.
conclusionsWe developed a high-performing and interpretable ML model for predicting VTE in ICU patients with sepsis. The model demonstrated robustness across cohorts and enhanced performance in the severe sepsis population. By integrating diverse clinical data and leveraging SHAP for transparent explanations, this tool may support personalized prophylaxis and early diagnostic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.