Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617179›Full record

ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2026

Staff experiences of implementing patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) in the NHS in England: findings from a rapid qualitative evaluation.

Cyril Lobont, Rachel Hutchings, Stuti Bagri, Nadia Crellin, Theo Georghiou, Stephanie Kumpunen, Jenny Negus, Pei Li Ng, Camille Oung, Angus I G Ramsay and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cyril LobontResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-0031-2129
Rachel HutchingsResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-6083-7759
Stuti BagriResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.
Nadia CrellinResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9497-5874
Theo GeorghiouResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9532-876X
Stephanie KumpunenResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7668-8687
Jenny NegusPatient and Public Representative, University College London, Dorset, UK.
Pei Li NgDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-220X
Camille OungResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-4504-310X
Angus I G RamsayDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-6916
Sarah ReedResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0329-9728
Chris Sherlaw-JohnsonResearch and Policy, The Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4851-6060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelState MedicineEnglandHumansInterviews as TopicJob SatisfactionQualitative ResearchWorkloadevaluationqualitative methodsworkforce

Identifiers

PMID41617179
PMCPMC13263458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.