Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41617082›Full record

ReviewJournal of sport and health science2026

Effects of different types of exercise over 24 weeks on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: A systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhining Zhou, Xiaoyu Wei, Xinwen Zhang, Barbara E Ainsworth, Jiaojiao Lü, Yu Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of sport and health science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhining ZhouKey Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China; School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xiaoyu WeiSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xinwen ZhangSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
Barbara E AinsworthSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China. Electronic address: barbara.ainsworth@asu.edu.
Jiaojiao LüKey Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China; School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China. Electronic address: ljj27@163.com.
Yu LiuKey Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China; School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise is a pivotal non-pharmacological strategy to prevent bone loss and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women (PMW). While various exercise modalities, such as mind-body (MBEx) (e.g., Tai Chi, yoga, and Pilates), resistance (Re), aerobic (Ae), impact (Im), and multimodal (Multimodal) exercise, can effectively improve bone mineral density (BMD), their effects differ across multiple skeletal sites. This study aimed to compare the effects of different exercise modalities on BMD at multiple skeletal sites in PMW.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase (July 1989 to June 2025) for randomized controlled trials testing exercise interventions lasting ≥24 weeks on BMD in PMW or healthy women aged ≥60 years. Studies with participants taking hormone replacement therapy, bone-affecting medications, or major comorbidities were excluded. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or dual-photon absorptiometry. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on intervention duration (<52 weeks vs. ≥52 weeks) and baseline BMD status (normal vs. low bone mass). Meta-regression was performed to examine time-related trends.

resultsAmong 24,071 studies, 74 studies (5331 participants) were included. Results showed that MBEx combined with Re (MBEx_Re) was the most effective modality for improving BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and total body. Multimodal showed benefits for total hip and femoral neck BMD, while MBEx, Re, Im, and Ae alone demonstrated site-specific effects. No significant effect was observed at the intertrochanter. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions lasting ≥52 weeks produced more consistent and sustained improvements than shorter interventions. Meta-regression indicated a general decline in effect size over time at most skeletal sites. Exercise-induced BMD gains were comparable between PMW with normal and low BMD.

conclusionExercise interventions have site- and modality-specific effects on BMD in PMW. Combined exercise modalities, such as MBEx_Re and Multimodal, may offer superior benefits for improving BMD, while single modality interventions remain effective at specific sites. Longer intervention durations (≥52 weeks) appear to promote more consistent and sustained improvements. These findings offer clinically relevant guidance for tailoring exercise prescriptions in the prevention and management of osteoporosis. Incorporating combined modalities, particularly those that integrate strength, balance, and neuromuscular coordination, may offer superior benefits for bone health, which may positively contribute to reducing osteoporotic fractures.

Indexed as

AgingExercise-induced bone remodelingLow bone massWomen’s bone health

Identifiers

PMID41617082
PMCPMC13123612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.