Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41616760›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

First Implementation of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Course in Undergraduate Medical Students in Peru: Mixed Methods Study.

Otto Barnaby Guillén-López

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Otto Barnaby Guillén-LópezSchool of Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Av. Honorio Delgado 430, San Martín de Porres, Lima, 15102, Peru, 51 3190000.ORCID 0000-0003-4012-4828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a test performed by physicians, as an adjunct to physical examination, to identify the presence or absence of specific clinical findings. This skill is not currently included in undergraduate medical education in Peru. Objective: This study aims to describe and evaluate the implementation of a POCUS course in undergraduate medical students. Methods: A pre-experimental study, without a control or comparison group, in which a pretest and posttest were used to evaluate the same group of students. A theoretical-practical POCUS course was designed and implemented for fifth-year medical students at the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia in Lima (Peru) during late 2019 and early 2020. Their prior knowledge was assessed using a pretest consisting of 10 short-answer questions. At the end of the course, a posttest consisting of 9 different questions on ultrasound image analysis and recognition was administered, and the same 10 pretest questions were also re-evaluated. Satisfaction and perception of learning were also assessed through a survey. A descriptive analysis was performed, obtaining absolute and relative frequencies. The Wilcoxon test for related samples was used to evaluate the differences between the pretest and posttest. Results: A total of 26 students participated in the course, although only 19 completed the post-test (10 women and 9 men). The average pretest score before the course started was 4.8 (SD 2.2) points, indicating poor prior knowledge. This average increased to 18.5 (SD 1.6) points when they retested the pretest at the end of the course. The average posttest score was 12.2 (SD 3.3) points, which differed significantly from the initial pretest average (P<.001). Only 15 students responded to the satisfaction survey, with more than 50% reporting that they had fully acquired the ability to assess the inferior vena cava, bladder, free fluid in the thorax and abdomen, and right kidney. They also reported that the course met 97.5% of their prior expectations, but all considered the practical sessions with the ultrasound equipment to be essential. Although they considered that the best aspects of the course were learning how to use the ultrasound equipment and the small size of the groups, they suggested that the course could be improved by increasing its duration and the number of practical sessions, as well as by conducting the practical sessions with real patients presenting some type of pathology. Conclusions: We have successfully created a short theoretical and practical course on POCUS and have applied it for the first time to undergraduate medical students after their clinical rotations. This course has enabled them to perceive a significant improvement in their ability to recognize certain abdominal and pelvic organs and anatomical structures using ultrasound. This course can serve as a starting point for replicating POCUS teaching in medical schools across the country.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, UndergraduatePoint-of-Care SystemsStudents, MedicalUltrasonographyAbdomenAdultCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePelvisPersonal SatisfactionPerucompetency-based educationcurriculummedical curriculummedical schoolsmedical trainingPOCUSpoint-of-care ultrasoundultrasoundundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID41616760
PMCPMC12858223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.