Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41616308›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2026

A Haptic-Driven Serious Game for Cognitive Stimulation and Visual Impairment Mitigation in Older Adults Based on the Design-Play-Experience Framework: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Xin Huang, Nazlena Mohamad Ali, Shafrida Sahrani, Yue Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin HuangInstitute of Visual Informatics (IVI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1966-6166
Nazlena Mohamad AliInstitute of Visual Informatics (IVI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-8328
Shafrida SahraniInstitute of Visual Informatics (IVI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4634-8021
Yue ZhangInstitute of Visual Informatics (IVI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0274-4900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of global aging, cognitive decline among older adults has become a prevalent issue, significantly impacting their daily lives. Serious games have demonstrated potential in enhancing cognitive abilities in this population. However, most existing serious games designed for older adults rely heavily on visual interfaces, which are often potentially detrimental for those with pre-existing visual impairments.

objectiveThis study had two primary objectives: (1) to design a theoretical prototype for a haptic-driven serious game for older adults based on the Design-Play-Experience (DPE) framework, aiming to enhance cognitive abilities, including attention, logical reasoning, and decision-making while simultaneously mitigating challenges associated with visual impairment, and (2) to conduct a pilot study evaluating the prototype's usability, accessibility, and user experience within the target population.

methodsWe used a cross-sectional, mixed methods pilot study with a single-group observational design, comprising a theoretical design and a pilot user study. First, the DPE framework was systematically applied to develop a game prototype by integrating haptic feedback technology (using built-in smartphone vibration motors) across its 3 core dimensions: design (haptic symbol system, accessible interface), play (dynamic difficulty adjustment), and experience (emotional engagement). Subsequently, a pilot study was conducted with 10 older adults recruited via convenience sampling (mean age 62.9, SD 3.35 years; 5 male, 5 female; all with self-reported mild visual impairments, such as presbyopia). Following interaction with the prototype, data were collected remotely using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and semistructured interviews administered via videoconferencing. Quantitative data from the SUS were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data from the interviews were processed using thematic analysis.

resultsPilot user studies showed that the game prototype had good usability, with an average SUS score of 89.5 (SD 2.72; 95% CI 87.6-91.4), which is considered "excellent." Thematic analysis of the interviews revealed three significant themes. The first theme was intuitive haptic feedback, which reflected that participants were able to quickly grasp and value the vibrational cues used to identify cards. The second theme was based on reduced eye strain, in which the combination of large fonts, high-contrast interfaces, and haptic feedback was praised for its effectiveness in relieving eye strain. The third theme was simplicity, where the simplified card game mechanics were considered both fun and challenging.

conclusionsThis study developed and validated a haptic, serious game for older adults. Its innovation lies in the systematic application of the DPE framework to achieve "haptic substitution for vision," which differs from previous research that focused on general immersive experiences. The main contribution of this study is providing a reusable design blueprint for creating easy-to-use cognitive training tools. These findings have practical implications in the real world, providing a feasible approach for deploying low visual load interventions in communities and care facilities.

Indexed as

cognitive abilitiesDesign-Play-ExperienceDPE frameworkhaptic feedbackolder adultspilot studyserious gamesvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID41616308
PMCPMC12905563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.