Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41616130›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2026

Leveraging Large Language Models for Early Detection of Anomaly Work Injury Cases: Data-Driven Approach to Rehabilitation Efficiency.

Peter Q Chen, Hayley Y W Gu, Heidi K Y Lo, Wing Chung Chang, Cameron J M Lai, Sun H S Lai, Andy S K Cheng, Peter H F Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter Q ChenDepartment of Computing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, PQ710, Mong Man Wai Building, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 27667248.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9055-4239
Hayley Y W GuDepartment of Computing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, PQ710, Mong Man Wai Building, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 27667248.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3648-3556
Heidi K Y LoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-5230
Wing Chung ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-8895
Cameron J M LaiTotal Rehabilitation Management (HK) Limited, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).
Sun H S LaiTotal Rehabilitation Management (HK) Limited, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).
Andy S K ChengDepartment of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7503-5273
Peter H F NgDepartment of Computing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, PQ710, Mong Man Wai Building, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 27667248.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-896X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in automating the analysis of unstructured clinical data, yet their application in rehabilitation therapy for work injury cases remains underexplored. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the performance of an LLM-assisted approach for the rapid identification of anomalous rehabilitation cases related to work injuries to enhance scalability and precision in case management. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 110,346 deidentified work injury cases between 2001 and 2024 from a leading rehabilitation coordination company in Hong Kong, representing approximately 20% of all work injury incidents in the region. LLMs were used to estimate the expected duration of recovery based on free-text injury descriptions. The cases in which the actual number of medically certified sick leave days exceeded the LLM-predicted maximum were classified as anomalies. Results: The LLM-assisted method achieved high accuracy, with GPT-4o achieving over 73% accuracy in nonanomalous classification and 79% accuracy in all dataset detection, outperforming comparator models. The model maintained high accuracy across subgroups and demonstrated the reliable extraction of information from free-text notes. Conclusions: The proposed method demonstrated robustness when evaluated on a large-scale dataset with a bimodal age distribution. This study highlights the potential of LLMs to transform rehabilitation workflows by automating anomaly detection at scale. The method also shows promise in tailoring rehabilitation strategies to age-specific needs and leveraging LLM tools for efficient case management. However, a key limitation is that the dataset includes only injury cases from a single geographic region, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations or health care systems.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionlarge language modelmachine learningrehabilitation predictionwork injury

Identifiers

PMID41616130
PMCPMC12858045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.