Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41616115›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2026

Effects of Using a Smartphone App Combined With Behavior Change Techniques on the Level of Physical Activity Among Adults and Older Adults: Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial.

Maria do Socorro Morais Pereira Simoes, Neli Leite Proença, Vinícius Tonon Lauria, Matheus Bibian do Nascimento, Ricardo da Costa Padovani, Victor Zuniga Dourado

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Adaptive clinical trials: key concepts for clinical researchers.Respiratory research & clinical practice · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria do Socorro Morais Pereira SimoesDepartamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 136 Silva Jardim St, Room 338, Santos, 11.015-020, Brazil, 55 13-99800-0315.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9358-0646
Neli Leite ProençaDepartamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 136 Silva Jardim St, Room 338, Santos, 11.015-020, Brazil, 55 13-99800-0315.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-9296
Vinícius Tonon LauriaDepartamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 136 Silva Jardim St, Room 338, Santos, 11.015-020, Brazil, 55 13-99800-0315.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8538-8723
Matheus Bibian do NascimentoDepartamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 136 Silva Jardim St, Room 338, Santos, 11.015-020, Brazil, 55 13-99800-0315.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7779-8821
Ricardo da Costa PadovaniDepartamento de Saúde, Educação e Sociedade, Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-2249
Victor Zuniga DouradoDepartamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 136 Silva Jardim St, Room 338, Santos, 11.015-020, Brazil, 55 13-99800-0315.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6222-3555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of tools, such as smartphone apps, to increase the level of physical activity (PA) decreases over time. Adaptive intervention trials have been recommended to test technology-based interventions owing to the possibility of adapting interventions based on individual responses. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of using a smartphone app combined with behavior change techniques on the PA level in adults and older adults (assessed using the step count). Moreover, the study investigated the time spent in sedentary behavior and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA). Methods: In this single-blinded, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial, participants were randomized into 3 groups during a 24-week intervention (group 1: app with tailored messages; group 2: app with tailored messages plus gamification I; and control group: educational information). In the sixth week, participants from groups 1 and 2 were classified as responders and nonresponders according to their average daily step count. Nonresponders were rerandomized among the other groups, adding a second type of gamification (group 3: app with tailored messages plus gamification II). After another 6 weeks, participants were reassessed and advised to keep monitoring their step count with the app, but without interference from the researchers. Face-to-face assessments were conducted. The behavior change techniques included app features (goal setting, auto-monitoring, ranking, and virtual badges) and researcher-provided resources (tailored messages and in-person sessions of PA). The intervention effects were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results: The study included 53 participants (control group: n=17, group 1: n=17, group 2: n=19; mean age 44.0, SD 12.7 years). Groups 1 and 2 had 63% (10/16) and 47% (7/15) responders, respectively (P=.38). Regarding the PA level, participants from group 1 showed increases in the average daily step count at all assessments (final vs initial: B=797.2 steps/day, 95% CI 475.3-1119.1; P<.001; follow-up vs initial: B=2097.6 steps/day, 95% CI 1577.2-2618.1; P<.001). All participants showed a reduction in the time spent in sedentary behavior at the final assessment compared with the initial assessment (B=-70.8 min/week, 95% CI -88.8 to -52.9; P<.001), without differences among groups. The time spent in MVPA varied across time among all participants. Regardless of the initial group and allocation in the second randomization, responders from groups 1 and 2 showed a constant increase in the average daily step count (week 6 vs week 1: B=1548.0 steps/day, 95% CI 1407.4-1688.6; P<.001; week 12 vs week 1: B=1720.3 steps/day, 95% CI 1568.8-1871.7; P<.001; week 12 vs week 6: B=172.3, 95% CI 20.8-323.8; P=.03). Conclusions: The adaptive intervention protocol using a smartphone app with behavior change techniques increased participants' PA levels. Stepping up behavior change techniques and progressively offering new stimuli may contribute to a change in behavior regarding PA.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyExerciseMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSedentary BehaviorSingle-Blind Methodadaptive clinical trialappphysical activitysmartphonetranstheoretical model of behavior change

Identifiers

PMID41616115
PMCPMC12857902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.