Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41616078›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Low-level contamination confounds population genomic analysis.

Audrey K Ward, Eduardo F C Scopel, Brent Shuman, Michelle Momany, Douda Bensasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Audrey K WardDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, 120 E. Green St., Athens, GA 30602, United States.
Eduardo F C ScopelInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, 120 E. Green St., Athens, GA 30602, United States.
Brent ShumanDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, 2502 Miller Plant Sciences, Athens, GA 30602, United States.
Michelle MomanyDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, 2502 Miller Plant Sciences, Athens, GA 30602, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7110-063X
Douda BensassonInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, 120 E. Green St., Athens, GA 30602, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9015-2707

Funding

National Science Foundation 1946046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome sequence contamination has a variety of causes and can originate from within or between species. Previous research focused on contamination between distantly related species or on prokaryotes. Here, we test for intraspecies contamination by mapping short read genome data to a reference and visualizing the frequency of reads with single nucleotide differences from the reference. Out of 1,298 publicly available genome sequences investigated for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a small number (eight genomes) show at least 5% contamination. Contamination rates differed however among sequencing centers: one unusually large study had a low contamination rate (below 0.2%) but the contamination rate was higher for other studies (2% or 15% of genomes). Using genome data contaminated in silico to known degrees, we showed that contamination is recognizable in plots with unexpected secondary allele (B-allele) frequencies of at least 5% and measured contamination effects on admixture and phylogenetic analysis in two fungal species. With a standard base calling pipeline, we found that contaminated genomes superficially appeared to produce good quality genome data. Yet as little as 5-10% genome contamination was enough to change phylogenetic tree topologies and make contaminated strains appear as hybrids between lineages (genetically admixed). We recommend the use of B-allele frequency plots to screen genome resequencing data for intraspecies contamination.

Indexed as

DNA ContaminationGenome, FungalGenomicsGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNABAF plotscross-contaminationheterozygosityphylogenomicpopulation genomicspopulation structuresingle nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calls

Identifiers

PMID41616078
PMCPMC13042315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.