ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Low-level contamination confounds population genomic analysis.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome sequence contamination has a variety of causes and can originate from within or between species. Previous research focused on contamination between distantly related species or on prokaryotes. Here, we test for intraspecies contamination by mapping short read genome data to a reference and visualizing the frequency of reads with single nucleotide differences from the reference. Out of 1,298 publicly available genome sequences investigated for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a small number (eight genomes) show at least 5% contamination. Contamination rates differed however among sequencing centers: one unusually large study had a low contamination rate (below 0.2%) but the contamination rate was higher for other studies (2% or 15% of genomes). Using genome data contaminated in silico to known degrees, we showed that contamination is recognizable in plots with unexpected secondary allele (B-allele) frequencies of at least 5% and measured contamination effects on admixture and phylogenetic analysis in two fungal species. With a standard base calling pipeline, we found that contaminated genomes superficially appeared to produce good quality genome data. Yet as little as 5-10% genome contamination was enough to change phylogenetic tree topologies and make contaminated strains appear as hybrids between lineages (genetically admixed). We recommend the use of B-allele frequency plots to screen genome resequencing data for intraspecies contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.