Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41616015›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Rare event detection by progressive clustering undersampling.

Amr Abuzeid, Elena Jolkver

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amr AbuzeidData Science Dept/IU Internationale Hochschule GmbH, Juri-Gagarin-Ring, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0539-3304
Elena JolkverData Science Dept/IU Internationale Hochschule GmbH, Juri-Gagarin-Ring, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4711-6708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capturing rare events in severely imbalanced datasets is challenging, as the learning and optimization processes are often biased toward the majority class. To address this issue, this study explores various resampling techniques and introduces a novel method called Progressive Clustering Undersampling (PCU). This technique removes negative instances that are distant from positive ones. PCU was compared with eight common undersampling and two oversampling techniques, consistently outperforming them on highly imbalanced and noisy datasets. The workflow demonstrates that rare anomalies can be effectively predicted using unsupervised methods based on frequency-driven decision boundaries. Progressive clustering ultimately identifies clusters with the highest concentration of positive instances. These delineated clusters are then saved by supervised models and used in the preparatory phase before prediction. The proposed method produces two outputs: one optimized for a high F1-score and the other for high precision. Overall, this approach presents a promising solution for identifying rare anomalies in complex, imbalanced data environments.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41616015
PMCPMC12858060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.