Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41616006›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

(Un)sweetened deal? Young people's views on the South African Health Promotion Levy and food in Khayelitsha, Cape Town.

Hannah Graff, Namhla Sicwebu, Janet Seeley, Benjamin Hawkins, Alison Swartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah GraffDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0026-6717
Namhla SicwebuSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Janet SeeleyDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-5272
Benjamin HawkinsMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-8046
Alison SwartzSt George's School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On 1 April 2018 the South African Health Promotion Levy on sugary beverages (HPL) came into effect with the goal of lowering the consumption of sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) across the South African population. The Republic of South Africa, following the economic and nutrition transitions that occurred after the end of Apartheid, has one of the highest rates of obesity in sub-Saharan Africa. Within this context, this qualitative study examined the food choices and food access of young people living in one neighbourhood of Khayelitsha, Cape Town in 2019 during the period soon after the implementation of the HPL. Through seven focus group discussions, we spoke with 71 young people (18-34) about their lives in Khayelitsha, their understandings and perceptions of food choices, food access, health and the HPL. Using a critical theory approach, we assessed the role of on-going income inequalities and high rates of unemployment on the lives of young, low-income South Africans, as well as how this continued to impact their food access, choices, and awareness of health. At the time of this study, the HPL was not having the desired impact in shifting and lowering the consumption of SSBs amongst this population. We used this exploration of the individual experience of the HPL in Khayelitsha as a metric for a critical policy reflection over time; adding to the small number of qualitative studies on this topic, strengthening the evidence for the inclusion of social and historical context in assessing global health interventions in local settings.

Identifiers

PMID41616006
PMCPMC12857988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.