ArticlePloS one2026
Pathogenic bacterial species and the microbiome of cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) inhabiting flea-infested homes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular detection of zoonotic pathogens in fleas collected from dogs and cats in Portugal.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCtenocephalides felis is a common ectoparasite of dogs and cats and can transmit a variety of pathogens including Bartonella and Rickettsia species. These bacteria, along with the known endosymbiont Wolbachia, are well-documented members of the C. felis microbiome, but species-level information is limited. Additionally, little is known about the variation in the C. felis microbiome in fleas from different sources and when different sequencing methods are applied to the same samples.
objectiveThis study aimed to characterize the flea microbiome using both short-read (V3/V4) and long-read (full-length) 16S rRNA gene sequencing, determine whether long-read sequencing improves species-level identification especially in known pathogenic genera, and evaluate differences in microbial composition between fleas collected from cats, dogs, and environmental traps.
methodsFleas were collected from cats, dogs, and traps in flea-infested homes in Florida, pooled by source, and sequenced using short- (V3/V4) and long-read (full-length) 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Microbial prevalence and abundance were compared across sequencing approaches. Community composition was evaluated for differences between sources and houses. Candidate members of the flea microbiome were identified based on a combination of prevalence, abundance, and statistical signatures of potential contaminant origin. For Rickettsia and Bartonella, species-level taxonomic assignments were refined using a phylogenetic approach.
resultsWolbachia, Rickettsia, and Bartonella were the most prevalent and abundant taxa. Spiroplasma was identified as a fourth core member of the flea microbiome. Long-read sequencing enabled better, but not perfect, species-level classification of Bartonella and Rickettsia compared to short-read sequencing. Important relationships between specific ASVs and flea sources were identified, for example fleas from cats harbored higher abundances of B. clarridgeiae and B. henselae than fleas from traps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.