ArticlePloS one2026
Optimization of decompression angles in facial nerve decompression surgery: A decompression model.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial nerve decompression is a surgical procedure performed for severe facial nerve paralysis associated with conditions such as Bell's palsy and Ramsay Hunt syndrome. Classical Western studies by Fisch first established the surgical principles of facial nerve decompression, providing the foundation for subsequent work on decompression extent and outcomes. However, the optimal extent of bony decompression of the facial nerve canal remains unclear, and a 180° removal of the surrounding bone has traditionally been performed based on empirical judgment. Nevertheless, more extensive bone removal may increase the risk of surgical complications. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the angle of bony decompression around the facial nerve canal and pressure reduction, in order to determine the optimal decompression angle. To achieve this, a simplified experimental model was employed to quantitatively evaluate the relationship between decompression angle and internal pressure reduction, providing mechanical insight into facial nerve decompression rather than clinical data. To evaluate this relationship, a decompression model was created, and pressure changes were measured at opening angles ranging from 30° to 180°. The results revealed that a 150° decompression provided a comparable reduction in pressure to that of a 180° decompression. These findings suggest that the extent of bone removal can be minimized while still achieving sufficient pressure reduction, potentially lowering the risk of nerve injury. We also observed significant pressure reduction at 30°, suggesting utility in regions where extensive bone removal is difficult. The finding that a 150° decompression produced an effect comparable to that of 180° is an important contribution toward improving surgical safety. Moving forward, we aim to refine the decompression model and conduct further investigations using more detailed angle settings, with the goal of establishing a practical surgical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.