ArticlePloS one2026
Estimation of enteric methane emissions in dairy cows under grazing a silvopastoral system and a grass monoculture in the Colombian Amazonian foothills.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Classification of Tropical Cattle Feeding Systems Reveals Consistent Associations with Dairy Lipid Quality, Enteric Methane Emissions, and Preclinical Metabolic Outcomes: A Multi-Study Narrative Synthesis.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Enteric Methane Emissions from Holstein Cows Grazing Kikuyu Grass in the Colombian High Tropics During Two Seasons.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitigating enteric methane in the humid tropics, particularly in the Colombian Amazonian foothills, remains challenging due to limited field-based data under real grazing conditions. This study evaluated the performance of a laser methane detector (LMD) as a non-invasive alternative to traditional techniques, providing the first field-based validation of this approach in Amazonian grazing systems. Two contrasting production systems were compared: a silvopastoral system (SPS) with trees and shrubs, and a grass monoculture (traditional pasture, TP). A crossover design (two groups of five cows) was implemented across four periods. The LMD enabled repeated, activity measurements without disrupting natural behavior, capturing emissions during grazing, ruminating, resting, and milking. Daily CH₄ emissions were significantly lower in SPS than TP (233 ± 6.95 vs. 277 ± 8.87 g CH₄ animal ⁻ ¹ day ⁻ ¹; p < 0.0001). Methane intensity also decreased in SPS when expressed per kg milk (15.5 vs. 20.7 g CH₄ kg ⁻ ¹), energy-corrected milk (16.0 vs. 21.2 g CH₄ kg ⁻ ¹), and dry matter intake (18.9 vs. 26.7 g CH₄ kg DMI ⁻ ¹; all p < 0.0001). Classification was based on animal activity rather than diet, allowing detailed behavioral associations with CH₄ release dynamics. While the LMD requires strict environmental protocols and does not capture continuous 24-h data, its portability and non-invasive nature make it a practical, scalable tool for tropical field conditions. These results provide novel evidence supporting SPS as a mitigation strategy, strengthen GHG inventories in tropical livestock systems, and offer guidance for policymakers promoting sustainable production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.