Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41615922›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

On embedding-based automatic mapping of clinical classification system: handling linguistic variations and granular inconsistencies.

Santosh Purja Pun, Oliver Obst, Jim Basilakis, Jeewani Anupama Ginige

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Santosh Purja PunSchool of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2196, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9820-2553
Oliver ObstSchool of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2196, Australia.
Jim BasilakisSchool of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2196, Australia.
Jeewani Anupama GinigeSchool of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2196, Australia.

Funding

Australian Consortium for Classification Development Postgraduate Research ScholarshipWestern Sydney UniversityWestern Sydney University and Australian Consortium for Classification Development Postgraduate Research Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMapping clinical classification systems, such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), is essential yet challenging. While the manual mapping method remains labor-intensive and lacks scalability, existing embedding-based automatic mapping methods, particularly those leveraging transformer-based pretrained encoders, encounter 2 persistent challenges: (1) linguistic variation and (2) varying granular details in clinical conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe introduce an automatic mapping method that combines the representational power of pretrained encoders with the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs). For each ICD code, we generate: (1) hierarchy-augmented (HA) and (2) LLM-generated (LG) descriptions to capture rich semantic nuances, addressing linguistic variation. Furthermore, we introduced a prompting framework (PR) that leverages LLM reasoning to handle granularity mismatches, including source-to-parent mappings.

resultsChapterwise mappings were performed between ICD versions (ICD-9-CM↔ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-AM↔ICD-11) using multiple LLMs. The proposed approach consistently outperformed the baseline across all ICD pairs and chapters. For example, combining HA descriptions with Qwen3-8B-generated descriptions yielded an average top-1 accuracy improvement of 6.5% (0.065) across the mapping cases. A small-scale pilot study further indicated that HA+LG remains effective in more challenging one-to-many mappings.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that integrating the representational power of pretrained encoders with LLM reasoning offers a robust, scalable strategy for automatic ICD mapping.

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesNatural Language ProcessingHumansLarge Language ModelsLinguisticsSemanticsautomatic mappingclinical classification systemsclinical term embeddingslarge language modelsprompting framework

Identifiers

PMID41615922
PMCPMC13089492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.