ArticleJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
Retrospective Evaluation of Admission Variables Associated With Outcome in Dogs With Bite Wound Trauma (12,412 cases): An ACVECC-VetCOT Registry Study.
Article in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe admission variables in dogs with bite wound trauma and to evaluate the relationship of these variables with the type of bite wound (penetrating, blunt, combination) and survival outcome.
designRetrospective evaluation of multi-institutional veterinary trauma registry data on dogs presenting with bite wound trauma.
settingVeterinary Committee on Trauma-identified Veterinary Trauma Centers (VTCs). ANIMALS: A total of 12,412 dogs with bite wound trauma presented to VTCs with data entered in the Veterinary Committee on Trauma registry from April 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021.
interventionsNone MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsAdmission variables and outcome were evaluated for dogs suffering from penetrating bite trauma (10,942/12,412; 88.16%), blunt bite trauma (479/12,412; 3.86%), and a combination of these (991/12,412; 7.98%). Among all groups, 95.06% (11,799/12,412) survived to discharge, 1.01% (125/12,412) died, and 3.93% (488/12,412) were euthanized. Patient sex (p < 0.001), modified Glasgow Coma Scale score (p < 0.001), Animal Trauma Triage score (p < 0.001), lactate concentration (p < 0.001), base excess (p < 0.001), blood glucose concentration (p < 0.001), ionized calcium concentration (p < 0.001), and PCV/total plasma protein concentration (p < 0.001/p < 0.001) were each associated with survival outcome. Head injury (p < 0.001) or spinal trauma (p < 0.001) at time of admission, or the requirement for blood product transfusion (p < 0.001), was associated with a negative survival outcome. Treatment by a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine prior to arrival to VTC was associated with survival. In multivariate analysis, higher body weight and surgical intervention were associated with survival. Older age and glucose dysregulation were associated with a negative survival outcome.
conclusionDogs sustaining bite wound trauma have an excellent prognosis for survival. These findings may help guide discussion with caregivers regarding patient care, resource requirements, and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.