Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41615689›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Sex and All-Cause Mortality in the US, 1999 to 2019.

Julia Francis, Barry I Graubard, Hormuzd Katki, Sarah S Jackson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia FrancisDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Barry I GraubardDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Hormuzd KatkiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Sarah S JacksonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While life expectancy in the US has increased among both sexes, a significant sex gap in mortality has been consistently observed during the past 2 decades. Objective: To examine differences in mortality rates between males and females for overall mortality and the leading 9 causes of mortality (coded by the National Death Index as diseases of the heart, malignant neoplasms, chronic lower respiratory diseases, unintentional injuries, cerebrovascular diseases, Alzheimer disease, diabetes, influenza and pneumonia, and nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included adults 20 years or older participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles between 1999 and 2016. Data were linked to the National Death Index from the date of survey participation through December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from July 16, 2024, to August 14, 2025. Exposure: Participation in the 1999-2016 NHANES cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate male-to-female hazard ratios (MF HR) for overall and cause-specific mortality, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics (eg, age, race and ethnicity), behavioral factors (eg, smoking, alcohol use), and chronic conditions (eg, diabetes, hypertension). The adjusted MF HRs were stratified by self-rated health, race and ethnicity, income, and educational level. Results: Among 47 056 participants (52.0% female and 48.0% male [weighted]), 12.9% (12.2% females and 13.6% males) were deceased at the end of follow-up. Males had a 63% higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with females, with the largest difference in mortality among individuals who died from heart disease (MF HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.72-2.24). The MF HR differed significantly across race and ethnicity for heart disease (range, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.36-2.35] for individuals of other race or ethnicity to 2.11 [95% CI, 1.80-2.48] for White individuals; P = .02 for interaction) and across income quartiles for mortality due to cerebrovascular diseases (range, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.25-1.38] for highest to 2.25 [95% CI, 1.31-3.86] for lowest income; P = .03 for interaction) and accidents (range, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.16-1.99] for highest income to 2.40 [95% CI, 1.03-5.58] for third highest income; P = .02 for interaction). No difference in the MF HR was found across self-rated health categories or education attainment levels. Information on covariates was largely collected by self-report, resulting in underreporting or overreporting due to social desirability bias. How these factors may have changed leading up to the time of mortality could not be accounted for. Conclusions: In this cohort study of adult NHANES participants, after accounting for a wide range of risk factors, the sex gap in mortality remained for most causes of mortality, suggesting there may be intrinsic biological factors (eg, sex hormones, chromosomes, immune response) associated with sex differences in mortality. Further research should investigate the effects of sex-linked biological factors on mortality.

Indexed as

MortalityAdultAgedCause of DeathFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesSex FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41615689
PMCPMC12859720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.