ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2026
Neuronal Representation of Auditory Distance Percepts vs. Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePerceiving the sound source distance is important in many everyday activities. For sources near the listener, two dominant intensity-independent cues are available, the direct-to-reverberant energy ratio (DRR) and the interaural level difference (ILD). Previous studies identified the planum temporale (PT) and posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) as auditory cortical areas important for distance processing. However, it is not clear whether the identified areas represent integrated percepts of distance, per se, or the discrete cues based on which it is created. To address this, we combined behavioral and neuroimaging experiments with advanced computational modeling.
methodsWe conducted human behavioral (15 participants with 5 self-reported females) and fMRI experiments (15 participants with 5 self-reported females) in a virtual reverberant environment using broadband noise stimuli. The availability and congruency of the DRR and ILD cues were manipulated to identify cortical areas encoding distance cues vs. distance percepts.
resultsBehavioral results showed that distance percepts were stronger when both cues were available and congruent, confirming that both cues are used when listeners judge distance. A univariate fMRI analysis identified areas in the PT + pSTG as encoding the DRR cue. An ROI-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) over the whole PT + pSTG region found a significant difference between Congruent and Incongruent stimuli, likely representing the distance percept.
conclusionThe PT + pSTG region encodes both the distance cues and percepts. However, while the cue encoding is local, the percepts are encoded in a distributed network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.