ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Vanishing twin syndrome and fetal reduction adversely affect perinatal outcomes following IVF-FET: an analysis based on 33,238 ongoing pregnancies.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the associations between vanishing twin (VT) and fetal reduction (FR) with obstetric and perinatal outcomes following in vitro fertilization (IVF)-frozen embryo transfer (FET).
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study involving women who had undergone FR or experienced VT during the period from 2012 to 2022. Cohorts were stratified by timing into early (< 15 weeks) and late (≥ 15 weeks) VT/FR. Controls comprised primary singletons and non-reduced twins. The primary outcome measurements were maternal and birth complications.
resultsAmong 33,238 ongoing pregnancies, there were 24,316 primary singletons, 7452 non-reduced twins, 1354 VTs, and 116 FRs. Multivariable analyses showed birth outcomes in the study groups were similar to or better than non-reduced twin deliveries. Compared to primary singletons, both early and late FRs were associated with increased risk of preterm birth (PTB); late FR also increased the risk of low birthweight (LBW). Early and late VTs similarly had higher risks of PTB and LBW versus primary singletons. Obstetric complications were generally comparable or lower in the study groups versus twin deliveries; however, late FR was linked to a higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with primary singletons, and late VT was associated with increased abnormal placentation versus primary singletons and twins.
conclusionsIn this large IVF-FET cohort, most birth and maternal outcomes were comparable or better than in non-reduced twins, but certain complications remained more common in both VT and FR groups. Both exposures were linked to adverse perinatal outcomes versus primary singletons. Moreover, VT and FR appear to be more problematic when these occur later in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.