ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Living with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP): an experience to amplify Italian patients' voices.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: From IL-5-Driven Pathogenetic Mechanisms to Clinical Management in the Italian Clinical Setting.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, yet there is a notable lack of studies addressing the disease burden and patients’ perspectives compared to other conditions such as asthma and allergies. This project aimed to gather insights from both patients living with CRSwNP and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in its management, with the goal of better understanding their experiences and identifying shared unmet needs and expectations.
methodTwelve CRSwNP patients participated in2 focus groups (open-ended questions) facilitated by a moderator. The insights gathered were presented to an expert board comprising HCPs and expert patients, both of whom are members of the PAG. Patients involved in the expert board enriched the qualitative data collection providing narratives of their personal experience.
resultsA total of 24 patients with CRSwNP participated in the analysis, 124 qualitative insights, distinct observations, comments or experiences related to their conditions, were gathered. The main priorities expressed were to decrease invasive procedures; avoid chronicity/reduce relapses; and create more opportunities for patients to be heard.
conclusionParticipants expressed expectations that extended beyond disease management, emphasizing the importance of their active involvement in shaping healthcare strategies. This project highlights the critical need to actively listen to the experiences and unmet needs of both patients and HCPs, integrating their perspectives into healthcare strategies to deliver practical, patient-centered improvements in the management of CRSwNP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.